Close
Updated:

Sacramento Woman Files Medical Malpractice Suit Against Surgeon, Part 1 of 9

It is worth noting that situations similar to those described in this medical malpractice case could just as easily occur at any of the healthcare facilities in the area, such as Kaiser Permanente, UC Davis Medical Center, Mercy, Methodist, or Sutter.

(Please also note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this personal injury case and its proceedings.)

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant, William Hall, M.D’s, Motion for Summary Judgment; Points and Authorities.

Plaintiff, Sandy White, hereby opposes Defendant William Hall, M.D.’S Motion for Summary Judgment. This Opposition is made on the grounds that there exist numerous triable issues of material fact demonstrating that Dr. Hall breached the applicable standard of care in the community in the care and treatment of Ms. White and that these breaches of the standard of care either caused and/or contributed to Ms. White’s injuries. As such, plaintiff respectfully requests that the court deny Dr. William Hall’s motion for summary judgment.

This Opposition is based upon this Notice, the attached Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the Declarations of Robert Lee, M.D., and Abbey Smith, Esq., the Separate Statement of Disputed Material Facts filed concurrently with this Opposition, and such other oral and documentary evidence as may be presented before or at the time of hearing of this Motion.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Sandy White, has brought this medical malpractice action against Dr. William Hall based on his professional malpractice in his care and treatment of Ms. White. Plaintiff originally filed this action on April 27, 2007, with trial in this matter scheduled for February 25, 2009.

For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins.

Defendant, William Hall, M.D., has now filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff opposes moving defendant’s motion on the basis that there exist triable issues of material fact that moving defendant breached the standard of care in the community in the care and treatment of Ms. White, and that such breaches, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, contributed to the injuries Ms. White suffered, including undergoing multiple subsequent surgeries on her left knee. (See Part 2 of 9.)

For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins.