The following blog entry is written from a defendant’s position as trial approaches. Reviewing this kind of briefing should help potential plaintiffs and clients better understand how parties in personal injury cases present such issues to the court. (Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) SUMMARY OF FACTS Plaintiff was falsely accused of sexually harassing defendant Tamara Black. Defendants’ investigations into these allegations were incredibly sloppy and…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine Exclude Testimony of Defendants’ Human Resources Expert Tina Hall INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Bobby White (hereinafter “Plaintiff” ) respectfully moves…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Mr. Black’s Opinions Will Assist the Trier of Fact and Therefore Are Relevant and Admissible. Finally, defendants argue that Mr. Black’s opinions…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Mr. Black’s Opinions Do Not Constitute the Improper Admission of Hearsay Evidence. Defendants next argue that Mr. Black’s opinions are based on…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Mr. Black’s Opinions Are Based on Proper Matters and Do Not Constitute Legal Conclusions. Defendants then argue that Mr. Black’s opinions are…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Mr. Black’s Opinions Are Within the Scope of His Expertise and Plaintiffs’ Designation Defendants first argue that Mr. Black’s opinions exceed the…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Defendants Have Not Shown That Expert Witness Michael Black’s Opinion Testimony Is Inadmissible. Defendants argue that any and all testimony by plaintiffs’…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) With respect to subject matter: The jury need not be wholly ignorant of the subject matter of the opinion . . .…
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this sexual harassment/personal injury case and its proceedings.) Plaintiffs Jim Green, John Brown, Stan White, and Paul Jones hereby oppose defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 12 To Exclude Evidence, Testimony…