It is worth noting that situations similar to those described in this medical malpractice case could just as easily occur at any of the healthcare facilities in the area, such as Kaiser Permanente, UC Davis Medical Center, Mercy, Methodist, or Sutter.
(Please also note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this personal injury lawsuit and its proceedings.)
Plaintiff Donald Hall’s Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiff’s Disputes with ABC Comprehensive Medical Group; Memorandum of Points and Authorities
Plaintiff, Donald Hall, hereby moves this Court for an order to exclude any evidence of plaintiff’s disputes with ABC Comprehensive Medical Group; and an order directing all parties, their counsel, witnesses and other persons participating in the trial to refrain from any reference, mention of, or allusion to plaintiff’s disputes with any employees, doctors, members, physical therapists or office staff of ABC Comprehensive Medical Group.
This motion is made on the grounds that said evidence is inadmissible pursuant to Evidence Code Sections 350, 351, and 352, as its probative value is outweighed by the probability of undue prejudice against this plaintiff. Any comment or attempted introduction of the above evidence would be improper and highly prejudicial to plaintiff.
Further, even if the court sustained an objection to the evidence at trial and instructed the jury to disregard it, the evidence would be so prejudicial that plaintiff could not receive a fair trial.
For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins.
This motion will be based upon the memorandum of points and authorities accompanying the motion, on the papers and records of file herein, and on such oral and documentary evidence as may be presented at the hearing of this motion. (See Part 2 of 2.)
For more information you are welcome to contact Sacramento personal injury lawyer, Moseley Collins.